Here’s the full text of that Eye of the Beholder article I referenced last week. (No point missing out on blogosphere visibility.)
‘Eye of the Beholder’ – New Bottom Line 14.5 – June 30, 2005
encountered very different perspectives from the world of business in
the past few weeks – emblematic of the challenges our industrial
society still faces.
I spent two days recently at the ‘Cradle to
Cradle Design & Intelligent Materials Pooling in Practice’ workshop
presented by Foundation for Global Community
in ‘Silicon Valley, CA’ (actually Menlo Park, but hey, which name has
the buzz?). Michael Braugart, Bill McDonough and others (including
Peter Senge and Joe Laur of the Society for Organizational Learning)
guided 150 people through the fundamentals and the challenges of C2C,
and a day of small group grappling with putting the concepts to work.
Dr. Braungart (co-founder of McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry
(MBDC) and advisor to Herman Miller, Nike, Ford, SC Johnson, Interface,
Unilever, BASF, Volkswagen and others) laid out his strategies for
moving beyond making products less harmful to making products that
support a sustainable future – in his inimitable way:
have people talking about ‘sustainability’! Nothing is more
boring. Are you proud if your marriage is ‘sustainable’? We feel
guilty, and cut our hair to use less shampoo. It’s guilt management and
Braungart showed gas chromatograph
analyses of the toxics that offgas from products in everyday user, from
electric shavers to childrens toys – ‘Pocket Polly emits more chemicals
than gasoline station’ – to even natural products like wood. ‘Weapons
of mass destruction,’ he called them, as we seal buildings, in the name
of energy efficiency, full of products not designed for indoor use.
indicative result: asthma is now the most prevalent children’s disease,
with 40% of children suffering from allergies, vs 2-3% a few decades
ago. ‘And smart people now go to business and law, not science.’
key, Braungart advised, is the transformation of environmental issues
into issue of quality. ‘First be effective – do the right thing;
then look for the right tools. Efficiency may be one of them, but
there’s no point being more efficient at producing a harmful outcome.
‘Students and top management understand this,’ he said. ‘Middle management hates us.’
new design criteria, according to Braungart: Cost, function, esthetics,
ecological intelligence, fairness, fun: Total Beauty Design.
‘It’s not beautiful if it’s toxic, and if you can’t make a living.’ The
design principles: Waste equals food; Use current solar income;
Celebrate (don’t just respect) diversity.
We need to look at the molecules, it turns out. Braungart outlined ‘five steps of eco-effectiveness’:
– Identify substances to eliminate (like PVC at Shaw, BASF, Miller, Nike)
– Personal preference (based on scientific experience) of what makes sense
– Passive positive list
– Active positive list
– Re-invention (what do you really want)
didn’t stop at five, since the next step was to build on this ‘creating
strength’ with ‘purchasing strength,’ in which companies with common
list of preferred materials pool their purchasing and logistics
strengths to gain economies of scale and rationalize supply chains.
Two of many applications discussed: a complex product, and a relatively simple one.
The Ford Model U concept car
is designed to go into enzyme bath – the whole product – at 60k miles
that will dissolve and filter out the glues, and ‘keep the intelligence
of the materials in it.’ Upcycling. ‘There’s no innovation in
Shaw Industries (the country’s largest carpet company, now owned by Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway)
see s C2C as its goal and focus, according to Steve Bradfield, their
Corporate Director of Environmental Affairs. ‘All the other stuff is
‘We’re looking way ahead; our EVP now talks about
‘what the company will look like in 25 yrs.’ It’s not about quarterly
profit, but about how do you stay in business?’ Bradfield notes. ‘C2C
is a beautiful thing, even to a bean counter if it’s profitable.’
began its materials redesign in 1994, and ‘exited PVC in 2004. ‘Product
recovery is at 50%, with a 30% recycle process efficiency; ‘so 25% of
new backing from old tile… at this point, while energy savings of 56%
nets to 14% (based on that 25% use).’
Shaw’s EcoWorx backing won
a Presidential Green Chemistry award in 2003, as an alternative to PVC,
with 40% recycled content. Among the business benefits: Shaw can get
more of the thinner and 30% lighter carpet tile on a trailer (7000
square yards vs 4000).
This highlights the challenge we often see
as companies struggle to comprehensively and accurately tally costs and
benefits. How well this is done can guide business strategy as well as
gate investment decisions – with significant competitiveness as well as
profit impacts. (Life cycle assessment isn’t the whole answer. Nylon
flooring will last 30 years, Bradfield notes, and that’s often the
figure used in LCIs, but it’s generally pulled in seven.)
(BTW, it takes some hard work to find any of this on the main Shaw web site; turns out it’s only on the Shaw Contract Group sub-site.)
Note: MBDC announced the C2C certification system
at the NeoCon conference in June, to evaluate and certify the quality
of products based on the principles of Cradle to Cradle Design. As
described in the launch announcement:
– Ingredient chemistry is
researched for its potential impacts on human and environmental health,
and strategies for phasing out any ingredients of concern must be in
– Product is recyclable following its use and a system for recovering and fully recycling the product has been identified;
– Manufacturing maximizes the use of current solar income and water quality; and
– Workplace and business practices are ethical and support employees and communities.
I mentioned ‘very different perspectives’ at the top of this posting. Here’s the other:
spent a few days recently with several dozen CEOs, VPs environment, and
risk management executives from a variety of companies, exploring the
challenges of ‘environmental health and safety’ implementation and
results. The wide-ranging and universally high quality presentations
included a brilliant and sweeping ‘futures scan’ by a very senior
executive of a very large energy company.
It was captivating. It
touched on everything from oil prices to geopolitics to China. And it
didn’t include a single word about greenhouse gases or climate change.
Food for thought.